![]()  | 
      Bibliography | Background | Hypotheses | Home | 
![]()
Text on this page is from Volunteer Stream Monitoring: A Methods Manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1997
| Biological 
      monitoring, the study of biological organisms and their responses, is used 
      to determine environmental conditions. One type of biological monitoring, 
      the biological survey or biosurvey, is described in this chapter. The biosurvey 
      involves collecting, processing, and analyzing aquatic organisms to determine 
      the health of the biological community in a stream.        
       
       In wadable streams (streams that can be easily walked across, with water no deeper than about thigh-high), the three most common biological organisms studied are fish, algae, and macroinvertebrates. This manual discusses macroinvertebrate monitoring only. Macroinvertebrates are organisms that are large (macro) enough to be seen with the naked eye and lack a backbone (invertebrate). They inhabit all types of running waters, from fast-flowing mountain streams to slow-moving muddy rivers. Examples of aquatic macroinvertebrates include insects in their larval or nymph form, crayfish, clams, snails, and worms (Fig. 4.1). Most live part or most of their life cycle attached to submerged rocks, logs, and vegetation.  | 
          
      Order Ephemeroptera  (Mayfly ) Family Baetidae  | 
  
      
      Order Plecoptera (Stonefly) Family Perlodidae  | 
    The 
      basic principle behind the study of macroinvertebrates is that some 
      are more sensitive to pollution than others. Therefore, if a stream site 
      is inhabited by organisms that can tolerate pollution - and the more pollution-sensitive 
      organisms are missing - a pollution problem is likely.        
       
       For example, stonefly nymphs - aquatic insects that are very sensitive to most pollutants - cannot survive if a stream's dissolved oxygen falls below a certain level. If a biosurvey shows that no stoneflies are present in a stream that used to support them, a hypothesis might be that dissolved oxygen has fallen to a point that keeps stoneflies from reproducing - or has killed them outright. This brings up both the advantage and disadvantage of the biosurvey. The advantage of the biosurvey is that it tells us very clearly when the stream ecosystem is impaired, or "sick," due to pollution or habitat loss. It is not difficult to realize that a stream full of many kinds of crawling and swimming "critters" is healthier than one without much life. The disadvantage of the biosurvey, on the other hand, is that it cannot definitively tell us why certain types of creatures are present or absent. In this case, the 
        absence of stoneflies might indeed be due to low dissolved oxygen. But 
        is the stream under-oxygenated because it flows too sluggishly or because 
        pollutants in the stream are damaging water quality by using up the oxygen? 
        The absence of stoneflies might also be due to other pollutants discharged 
        by factories or running off farmland, water temperatures that are too 
        high, habitat degradation such as excess sand or silt on the stream bottom 
        that has ruined stonefly sheltering areas, or other conditions. Thus a 
        biosurvey should be accompanied by an assessment of habitat and water 
        quality conditions in order to help explain biosurvey results.        
          | 
  
![]()
Monitoring for water quality conditions such as low dissolved oxygen, temperature, nutrients, and pH helps identify which pollutants are responsible for impacts to a stream. Water quality monitoring is discussed in Chapter 5.
![]()
The information provided by biosurveys and habitat assessments can be used for many purposes.
To screen for impairment. 
  
  Biosurveys can be used to identify problem sites along a stream. A habitat assessment 
  can help deter- mine whether the problem is due, at least in part, to a habitat 
  limitation such as poor bank conditions. 
To identify the impact 
  of pollution and of pollution control activities. 
  Because macroinvertebrates are stationary and are sensitive to different degrees 
  of pollution, changes in their abundance and variety vividly illustrate the 
  impact pollution is having on the stream. Loss of macroinvertebrates in the 
  stream, or of trees along the stream bank, are environmental impacts that a 
  wide segment of society can relate to. Similarly, when a pollution control activity 
  takes place - say, a fence is built to keep cows out of the stream-a biosurvey 
  may show that the sensitive macroinvertebrates have returned and a habitat assessment 
  might find that the formerly eroded stream banks have recovered. 0 To determine 
  the severity of the pollution problem and to rank stream sites. To use biological 
  data properly, water resource analysts generally compare the results from the 
  stream sites under study to those of sites in ideal or nearly ideal condition 
  (called a reference condition). Individual stream sites can then be ranked from 
  best to worst, and priorities can be set for their improvement. 
To determine 
  support of aquatic life uses. 
  All states designate their waters for certain specific uses, such as swimming 
  or as cold water fishery. States establish specific standards (limits on pollutants) 
  identifying what concentrations of chemical pollutants are allowable if designated 
  stream uses are to be maintained. Increasingly, states are also developing biological 
  criteria- essentially, statements of what biological conditions should be in 
  various types of streams throughout the state. States are required by the Clean 
  Water Act to report on those waters which do not support their designated uses. 
  
  Biological surveys directly examine the aquatic organisms in streams and the 
  stressors that affect them. Therefore, these surveys are ideal tools to use 
  in determining whether a stream's designated aquatic life uses are supported. 
  
To identify 
  water quality trends. 
  In any given site, biological data can be used to identify water quality trends 
  (increasing or decreasing) over several years.  
 
 
  
  Order Ephemeroptera (Mayfly ) Family Ephemeriliidae Genus Drunella
![]()
Text on this page is from Volunteer Stream Monitoring: A Methods Manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1997
Illustrations by John King from Klamath River Studies for Grades 4-6 © Copyright 1991 D. Higgins
![]()
References
CA Department of Fish and Game. 1999. California stream bioassessment procedure: Protocol brief for biological and physical/habitat assessment in wadeable streams. Aquatic Bioassessment/Water Pollution Control Laboratory. Rancho Cordova, CA. 15 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1997. Field and laboratory methods for macroinvertebrate and habitat assessment of low gradient non-tidal streams. USEPA, Mid-Atlantic Coastal Streams Workgroup. Environmental Services Division, Region 3. Wheeling, WV. 49 pp. [525kb]
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1997. Volunteer stream monitoring: A methods manual. EPA 841-B-97-003. USEPA, Office of Water. 214 pp. [2.14Mb] http://www.epa.gov/owow/monitoring/volunteer/stream/
CA Department of Fish and Game 1999 An Index of Biological Integrity for First to Third Order Russian River Tributary Streams. Water Pollution Control Laboratory. Rancho Cordova, CA
![]()
Web Sites
California State Water Resources Control Board, Water Quality Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/swamp/
Marin County Stormwater 
  Pollution Prevention Program's Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Sampling Program 
  http://www.mywatershed.org/bmi/ 
Summary of State Biological 
  Assessment Programs for Streams and Rivers 
  http://www.epa.gov/owow/monitoring/newmon/bio/
PEERS Aquatic Macroinvertebrate 
  ID Key   
  http://140.211.62.101/macroinverts/home.shtml 
North American Benthological 
  Society (NABS)
  http://www.benthos.org/ 
North American Benthological Society (NABS) links to aquatic insect sites http://www.benthos.org/Links/index.cfm/task/Display/URLtopic/Aquatic%20insects
![]()
| 
         Table of Contents for Background Pages  | 
    |||||
| Stream Conditions: | Water Quality | Sediment | Riparian | Big Wood | Habitat Types | 
| Watershed Conditions: | Vegetation Types | Slope Stability | Roads & Erosion | Cumulative Impacts | Urbanization | 
| Fish & Aquatic Life: | Fish Populations | Amphibians | Aquatic Insects | Hatcheries | Fish Disease | 
| Restoration: | Stream Clearance | In-stream Structures | Riparian | Watershed | Strategy | 
| Geology / Hydrology: | Geology | Soils | Precipitation | Stream Flow | Channel Processes | 
| Policy & Regulation | ESA | TMDL | Forest Rules | 1603 Permits | Water Rights | 
| www.krisweb.com |